教育学论文 金融学论文 国际商务管理论文 市场营销论文 会计学论文 社会学论文 旅游管理论文 计算机论文 人力资源管理论文 广告媒体学 物流学论文 Engineering Thesis sociology Thesis MBA论文 linguistic Thesis Journalism and Mass CommunicatLaw Thesis Economics Thesis
返回首页

Law Thesis:商法

时间:2015-11-03 17:13来源:www.ukthesis.org 作者:英国论文网 点击联系客服: 客服:Damien

Law Thesis:LL.M 商法
LL.M Commercial Law

法院该在显著地更大程度上提升公司的面纱吗?
 

“在所罗门v所罗门&有限公司规定,原则必须被非常仔细地阅读。这应该经常被认为,在法院无法看到有限公司隐瞒事实的个性。但这不是真的。法院可以而且经常做到招致隐瞒。他们可以而且经常摘下面具。他们看得到谎言背后真正是什么。立法机构显示组帐户和其他的方式。并且法院应该效仿。我认为我们应该看看 Fork 公司以及看看它真正是怎样的——纳税人的全资子公司。生物,纳税人的傀儡事实上,它应该被视为法律。”
 

文献目录
 

介绍
 

本文将讨论有限责任的原则以及企业个性和法院不愿意不顾公司面纱原则称为“刺穿公司面纱”。我们应当考虑在法院可以解开刺穿公司的面纱的情况下,为什么他们在大多数情况下支持在所罗门v所罗门& Co的决定[1]。
 

英国所有公司必须被注册和合并,根据公司法案,管理有限责任原则。因此窗帘给业主或股东对债权人的责任的情况下,该公司陷入财务困境。这窗帘给公司创建一个独立的法律人格,这样它可以起诉以及因自己的权利和唯一的所有者或股东损失而被起诉,持有公司股份的数量在清算时没有影响他们的个人资产。
 

LL.M Commercial Law
 
法院会在更大程度上揭开公司的面纱吗——Should Courts Lift the Corporate Veil to a significantly greater extent?
 
"The doctrine laid down in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd has to be watched very carefully. It has often been supposed to cast a veil over the personality of a limited company through which the courts cannot see. But that is not true. The courts can and often do draw aside the veil. They can and often do pull off the mask. They look to see what really lies behind. The legislature has shown the way with group accounts and the rest. And the courts should follow suit. I think that we should look at the Fork company and see it as it really is - the wholly owned subsidiary of the tax payers. It is the creature, the puppet of the taxpayers in point of fact, and it should be so regarded in point of law."
 
Per Lord Denning MR, Littlewoods Mail Order Stores Ltd v I.R.C. [1969] 3 All ER 855
 

文献目录——Bibliography
 
介绍—— Introduction

 

This dissertation will discuss the principles of limited liability and corporate personality and the courts’ reluctance to disregard the corporate veil the principle called “piercing the Corporate Veil”. We shall consider the circumstances in which the Courts have been able to pierce the veil of incorporation and the reasons as to why they have in most cases upheld the decision in Solomon v Solomon & Co[1].(责任编辑:cinq)



------分隔符-------------------------------------
UK Thesis Base Contacts
推荐内容