教育学论文金融学论文 国际商务管理论文 市场营销论文 会计学论文 社会学论文 旅游管理论文 计算机论文 人力资源管理论文 广告媒体学 物流学论文 Engineering Thesis sociology Thesis MBA论文 linguistic Thesis Journalism and Mass Communicat Law Thesis Economics Thesis
返回首页

关于汇率制度的选择的问题的探讨

时间:2013-03-06 22:22来源:www.ukthesis.org 作者:英国论文网 点击联系客服: 客服:Damien
The choice of foreign exchange rate regime汇率制度的选择
One of the most debated issues in international economics concerns the choice ofexchange rate regime and the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of fixed versus flexible or floating exchange rates.
在国际经济事物中最具争议的问题之一是关于选择多种交换的汇率制度以及优点可缺点混杂的固定与灵活的浮动汇率。
Inpractice neither extreme has ever really existed, but it remains useful to use these ideal types as thebasis for drawing some positive and normative conclusions of relevance when choosing a hybridsystem. In this sense, the debate over fixed versus flexible exchange rates is analogous to that betweenperfect competition and monopoly in the economic analysis of market structures.
The below illustration depicts the spectrum of exchange rate regimes. It is interesting to note thatsince the industrial revolution there has been a movement away from fixed towards more flexibleexchange rate regimes for the industrialised world. This trend, however, now appears to be in reversefor the membership of the European Union (EU). The European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) ofthe European Monetary System (EMS), which Britain joined on 8thOctober 1990, is a distinct shiftback to less flexible exchange rates between the participating countries. The proposed continuationalong this path to monetary union would entail the disappearance of exchange rates between EUmember states altogether as a single currency is adopted for use.
Furthermore, there is the notion of an ‘idea’ exchange rate that combines short-term stability (i.e.tends towards a more fixed system) with longer-term flexibility as both the economy concerned, butalso that of the global economic environment will inevitably change over time. Hence, in the short-term the arguments regarding trade preferring greater certainty are foremost, whilst the dangers oflocking a country into a permanent position with other currencies / economies is seen as a potentialproblem in the long-run.http://ukthesis.org/jr/
Fixed versus floating exchange rates固定与浮动汇率
Perhaps the most popular argument in favour of floating exchange rates can be summed up by theexpression,
也许最流行的说法可以概括的表达出对浮动汇率的赞成。
‘the market knows best’. ‘Best’ here implies that a competitive foreign exchangemarket would be a more efficient means of achieving balance of payments equilibrium andadjustments of the exchange rate over time. However, it may also reflect normative preferencesthat market mechanisms are more desirable than leaving decisions to government officials and/ormonetary authorities.(ii) A second argument notes that exchange rates always adjust to ensure continuous equilibriumbetween the demand and supply of the currency. Thus, an efficient market clearing mechanismquickly eliminates temporary disequilibrium positions, based upon the current account theorydiscussed in lecture six. Excess demand for a currency leads to its appreciation, thereby makingimports cheaper and exports more expensive, and consequently reduces the excess demand forthe currency as imports rise and exports fall. Similarly, excess supply of a currency leads to itsfall in value, making exports cheaper and imports more expensive, and therefore stimulatingdemand for the currency through higher exports and lower imports. No one expects theadjustment process to be quite as smooth as this. However, if arbitrage and speculation arestabilising, it provides an efficient and automatic solution to the balance of payments problems.(iii) Floating exchange rates enable countries to operate independent monetary policies. Floating is,according to this viewpoint, essential to restore monetary autonomy for each country, whichwould otherwise be constrained by an arbitrary exchange rate target, thereby allowing it todetermine its own employment and inflation rates. Under fixed systems, the need to maintainlong term competitiveness requires a country to achieve essentially similar inflation rates to othercountries, thereby restricting it from pursuing markedly different economic policies. Under fixedexchange rate regimes, monetary policy is focused upon the maintenance of the exchange rateparity and is therefore not available for other macroeconomic goals. This economic argument isalso sometimes expanded to claim that this element of fixed exchange rates dis-empowersdemocracy since democratic decisions to pursue an economic strategy aimed at securing fullemployment, for example, would be de-railed if inflation remained higher than elsewhere. Acounter argument asserts that, in a world of global financial capital flows and internationalmoney markets, monetary autonomy does not exist. This view holds that interest rates must movetowards a world norm, which negates this criticism of fixed exchange rates to the extent that it isan accurate description of economic reality.这种观点认为,利率必须在世界规范的范围内浮动,从而否定了备受人争议的固定汇率,这是一个准确的描述经济现实的观点。(责任编辑:BUG)


------分隔符-------------------------------------
UK Thesis Base Contacts
推荐内容