Case Study案例分析代写-全球商业案例研究。本文是一篇由本站代写服务提供的留学生Case Study案例分析作业范文，主要内容是根据作业给出的案例进行分析，并得出结论。本篇Case Study总结出A国的生活水平高于B国。一个国家的GDP与其人口呈正相关，因此高人口很容易转化为更高水平的国民生产总值。例如，A国有1.2亿人口，而B国有8000万公民。这意味着，A国的人均GDP也高于B国，超过1.952美元。值得一提的是，人均国内生产总值是该国的全部国内生产总值除以总人口。它显示了该国单个公民的平均收入）。
同时本篇Case Study提出国家A的社会发展高于国家B的社会发展。例如，两国的人口分布揭示了社会福利发展的差异。在这种情况下，A国拥有充足的社会资源，农村人口与城市人口的比例分别为21%和79%。相比之下，B国在社会福利方面发展不足，农村人口与城市人口的比例分别为45%和55%。同样，两国在教育方面也有着多样化的发展，因此，与B国的90%相比，A国94%的成年人达到了基本识字水平。以下内容就是这篇Case Study案例分析代写范文的具体内容，供参考。
Part A Drawing Conclusions
The living standards of country A are higher than those of country B. The GDP of a country is positively correlated with its population such that high population easily translates into higher levels of national product. For example, Country A has a population of 120 million people as compared to country B which has 80 million citizens. This means that the GDP per capita of country A is also above that of Country B with more than $1.952. It is important to recall that the GDP per capita is the entire GDP of the country divided by the total population. It shows the average amount of income earned by a single citizen in the country (Neal & Shone, 2016).
The social development of country A is higher than the social development of country B. for example, the demographic distribution of the two countries reveal disparities in the development of social amenities. In this case, country A is well endowed in terms of social resources as depicted by the ratio rural-urban population of 21 percent to 79 percent respectively. In contrast, Country B is poorly developed with regard to social amenities such that its ratio of rural to urban population stands at 45 % and 55 % respectively. Likewise, the two countries have diversified development in terms of education such that 94 percent of adults in country A have attained basic literacy levels as compared to country B which is recorded at 90 percent (Neal & Shone, 2016).
The economic development of country A is higher than that of country B. For example, the income inequalities between the two countries depict the gap between the rich and poor as well as the rate of resource allocation. It has been noted that from the 20 percent samples of the poorest and wealthiest people in Country A, only 4.19 percent and 54.6 percent are contributed respectively by the two groups. Additionally, the price levels in the countries are depicted by the inflation rates. For instance, the inflation rate of country A stands at 2.8 percent while Country B is recorded at 4.8 percent (Neal & Shone, 2016).
Part B Timeline Graph
Source: EIU (2017).Malaysia and Philippines: Selected series 2012 to 2022[Datafile]. Retrieved from https://eiu-bvdep-com.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/version-
Part C Foreign Direct Investment 外国直接投资
Foreign direct investment (FDI) refers to the allocation of funds by an investor in a business into another country, and substantial control is exercised over this entity. For an investor to control a firm, they should own more that 10 percent of the share capital. Organizations that have specialized in FDIs are referred to as multinational corporations (MNCs) or sometimes are known as multinational enterprises (MNEs). It is important to note that an MNC makes the decision of investment through Greenfield or Brownfield; whereby the former refers to investment in the new enterprise from start-up phase, while the latter refers to a foreign firm acquiring some stake in the local company (Gudmundsson, 2013).
There are three basic types of FDIs that firms can engage in as penetration strategies in the foreign market so as to increase presence and market share.Â FDI takes various forms in taking business operations across borders such as full ownership, joint venture and new establishments. The investor might make the decision of buying the whole percentage of shares of the existing company so as to gain full control in terms of ownership and management. On the other hand, joint ventures take the form of the investor collaborates with local investors to run the business, it is important to note that, this form of FDI is highly preferable to the others due to the fact that the local investors possess knowledge about and experience regarding the local market.Â Likewise, the investor might make the conscious decision totally new subsidiaries in the foreign country so as to undertake production at cost advantages (Gudmundsson, 2013).
Acquisitions are popular among investors due to the numerous benefits that accrue to them such as speed, market power, negating entry barriers, and availing resources and competencies. The most fundamental advantage of investing in a Brownfield is the speed with which the investors acquire control of the entities through possession of assets and core competencies that had hitherto existed in the world of dreams. This management strategy allows the investors to gain direct access to new products and services and new forms of markets. Similarly, it is possible to overcome the negativities accompanied with risks and costs of production in case of developing a new product (Gudmundsson, 2013).
Acquisitions of local companies by foreign investors allow them to acquire market power that was yielded by the defunct entities. The presence and share of the acquisitions increase after the completion of the transactions. In this regard, the new entities are in a position to reduce the amount of competition which they are subjected to as well as engage in product diversification.Â Acquisitions enable investors to overcome the bureaucratic requirements of entry to the industries. This is because the Brownfield already exists in the market before the conclusion of the transaction. In other words, the risks that would have been incurred in terms of competition are averted henceforth (Gudmundsson, 2013).
On the other hand, the key disadvantages of acquisitions are many in terms of the negative effects they cause on the business. Firstly, there are problems to do with the integration of the philosophies, cultures, processes and structure of the old and new firms. Secondly, there are high costs incurred in terms of acquisition capital as well as restructuring and adoption of new technology. Thirdly, the financial consequences might be dire in terms of failure to recoup the costs incurred. The new firms may also undertake to invest in ventures that are not promising in terms of returns despite the insurmountable diversifications undertaken. Finally, the top managements might impede the internal development at the expense of local attention (Gudmundsson, 2013).
References List 参考文献
EIU (2017).Malaysia and Philippines: Selected series 2012 to 2022[Datafile].
Gudmundsson, G. (2013). Multivariate Analysis of Economic Variables. Applied Statistics, 26(1), 48-53. doi:10.2307/2346867
Neal, F., & Shone, R. (2016). Relationships Between Economic Variables. Economic Model Building, 12(45), 27-53. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15673-3_2
另一方面，Case Study提出收购的主要缺点是对业务造成的负面影响。首先，新旧企业的哲学、文化、流程和结构的整合存在问题。其次，在收购资本以及重组和采用新技术方面产生了高昂的成本。第三，如果不能收回所产生的成本，财务后果可能是可怕的。尽管进行了难以克服的多样化，但新公司也可能承诺投资于回报率不高的企业。最后，最高管理层可能会以牺牲当地关注为代价阻碍内部发展。本站提供各国各专业留学生Case Study案例分析范文，Case Study代写以及Case Study写作辅导，如有需要可咨询本平台一起学习并掌握Case Study案例分析怎么写。
UKthesis provides an online writing service for all types of academic writing. Check out some of them and don't hesitate to place your order.